Started by M O'D, September 15, 2014, 08:22:50 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
QuoteCDC whistleblower: behind the media blackoutby Jon RappoportSeptember 14, 2014NoMoreFakeNews.comAside from a few bland stories about William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower, the major media have maintained a forced blackout.Thompson has publicly admitted he and his co-authors committed gross fraud in erasing a vaccine-autism connection.Consider the explosive angles on this story, angles which would ordinarily rate front-page coverage and top billing on the evening news.Thompson, in writing, has admitted fraud. He was a co-author of the cooked and slanted 2004 study, published in the prestigious journal, Pediatrics.That study gave a free pass to the MMR vaccine, and falsely denied the vaccine had any causal connection to autism.This never happens—an author of a key study comes out in the open and says he and his co-authors are guilty of malfeasance and fraud. Are you kidding? That alone equals a big story.Two of Thompson's co-authors, Colleen Boyle and Frank DeStefano, also happen to be major executives at the CDC, in the area of vaccine safety. That's another bombshell element.The journal Pediatrics has refused to retract the 2004 study. After consulting the other authors, but not Thompson, the journal stands by the study. That's more malfeasance and fraud.In 2004, Thompson wrote to the head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding, warning her that he would soon be presenting troubling data at a major vaccine-autism conference.His meaning was clear. He had found an MMR vaccine-autism connection and was going to speak about it.Gerberding never responded to Thompson's letter. His presentation at the upcoming conference was canceled.Five years later, Gerberding left the CDC. She went on to become the president of Merck Vaccines, a position she holds today.Merck manufactures the MMR vaccine.That vaccine was the subject of the fraudulent 2004 study, and was criminally given a free pass.If you were constructing a scandal to blow up in the press, a scandal that would contain all the elements, you would be hard-pressed to do a better job.But what we get is silence. All the way across the board.Want more? In a video, Thompson states that he would never give a vaccine containing mercury to a pregnant woman. He says there is "biological plausibility" for mercury as a cause of autism.Thompson and his co-authors on the 2004 study have also done other studies on vaccines. The CDC is reviewing none of them to see if they were fraudulent as well.Let's look at the reasons for the media blackout.On one level, it's all about the CDC, Thompson's employer. The CDC is a major and continuing source for mainstream reporters. Irritate and anger that source, and you as a reporter are shut out from access in the future.On another level, the mainstream press is utterly dependent on pharmaceutical advertising. Implicit and explicit threats of ad cancellations are enough to drive any media outlet to its knees, groveling and begging for forgiveness.Yes, you will certainly find stories about pharma drug scandals in the press. But Thompson's story strikes at the very heart of the medical complex: its claim to a scientific basis.That supposed science is the foundation of "everything medical"—and it is reflected in studies published in peer-reviewed reputable journals.Thompson isn't coming in from the outside criticizing a published study. He was and still is working at the CDC, where the 2004 study was done. He's an insider. He co-wrote the study.He's made a written confession of fraud re the study and released it through his attorney, Rick Morgan. He's admitted to scientific fraud.On yet another level, vaccines are a holy sacrament in the medical Church of Biological Truth.Vaccines are lauded as the pre-eminent achievement of modern medicine.The US government and its allies have, time and time again, asserted there is absolutely no connection between vaccines and autism.And here is an insider, Thompson, who is essentially saying that is a lie.He could be the key figure in unraveling fraud all the way through the vaccine establishment.power outside the matrixAnd finally, there is a constituency that already knows all about the lie: mothers and fathers of autistic children.They know. They were there, when their happy, bright, alert children were vaccinated and then, their brains damaged, turned away from the world.To publicly admit what these parents already know would set off a firestorm that would never end.So the mainstream press remains willfully ignorant. Reporters, editors, and publishers aid and abet the ongoing crime of vaccine damage.The entirety of mainstream media performs a specific function. It takes cues and orders from elites who are intent on building Reality for the masses, and it transmits that Reality on a continuing basis. There are certain stories which, if exposed, would engender contagion.That is, such stories would not only reveal one set of secrets, they would suggest that other pillars of the overall false Reality are rotting as well.The prime directive of major media: this contagion must never be allowed to happen.Thus, the William Thompson saga is buried.However, with enough pressure from alternative media, parents of autistic children, and the awakening public, surprises can occur.Certainly, the exit from major media, by more and more of its audience, can accelerate beyond any possibility of top-down control.All their boats, swamped.This, in fact, is what happened during the 2009 Swine Flu hoax. Millions of people ignored the CDC's fake science and demands to take the vaccine—and the "level-6 global pandemic" was revealed as a dud.Stay tuned.
QuoteThey write a letter to the CDC chief of staffAnd I write a letter to themby Jon Rappoporthttps://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/01/15/cdc-spider-scientists-attack-the-cdc-blow-the-lid-off/January 15, 2017There is a group of anonymous scientists at the US Centers for Disease Control---they call themselves the Spider Group. They have penned a letter to the CDC's chief of staff, Carmen S. Villar:Here is the explosive accusation they make:"We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception.""Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors. Others see it and turn the other way. Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right.""We have representatives from across the agency that witness this unacceptable behavior. It occurs at all levels and in all of our respective units. These questionable and unethical practices threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health."I have written at length about another whistleblower at the CDC, William Thompson, a long-time researcher who, in August of 2014, confessed in writing to massive fraud (archive here). He admitted that, in a study on the safety of the MMR vaccine, he and his colleagues literally threw vital sheets of data into a garbage can. The study then gave a free pass to the vaccine, claiming it had no connection to autism---when in fact it did. Thompson is the subject of the film, Vaxxed (trailer).Now with this letter, we see that other scientists at the CDC are blowing the lid off internal corruption at their Agency.If, in fact, President-elect Trump gives the green light for an independent investigation of the CDC, as press outlets are now reporting, and if he appoints Robert Kennedy Jr. to head up that panel, as Kennedy claims, we are going to see a large number of hidden facts emerge from the secretive halls of the CDC.Because this Spider Group is anonymous, I wanted to make sure their letter is real. I contacted reporter Carey Gillam (twitter), who has been covering the story. I received this reply: "I was able to authenticate the letter by contacting CDC's public affairs office and asking them directly about it after I received it from internal CDC sources."You can read the full Spider Group's letter here at US Right To Know.And now I write a letter to them, so they can deepen their investigation.Dear Spider Group:I commend you on making an important start. You're on the right road. As a reporter who has covered the CDC for many years, I offer you three suggestions. This short list is by no means exhaustive. I'm just pointing to a few areas where your own research will yield very rich and fertile results.ONE: SWINE FLU FRAUD.Let me take you back to the late summer of 2009, and the Swine Flu epidemic, which was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine. Remember?The problem was, the CDC was concealing a scandal.At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.The CDC's main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.What was the Agency up to?Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the "pandemic," without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn't that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn't there more to find out?Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was "the most original story" he'd seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it and, in the end, no broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.—end of interview excerpt—It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they'd diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the "most likely" Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.That was the big secret. That's what the CDC was hiding. That's why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That's what Attkisson had discovered. That's why she was shut down.But it gets even worse.Because about three weeks after Attkisson's findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC's response: "Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC's best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 ." ("22 million cases of Swine Flu in US," by Daniel J. DeNoon).Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.There is no Swine Flu epidemic.Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.TWO: THE CDC BUYS MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF VACCINES AND, AT THE SAME TIME, HEADS UP RESEARCH ON THE SAFETY OF VACCINES. EXPLOSIVE STRUCTURAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST.If you wanted to buy a product, and the main source of research on the product was the company selling it, would you automatically assume the product was safe and effective?But you see, that's the just the beginning of the problem. Suppose the company's research was cited thousands of times in the press, as the authoritative standard of proof---and anyone who disputed that research was labeled a conspiracy theorist and a quack and a danger to the community and an anti-science lunatic.Would you begin to suspect the company had some awesome media connections? Would you suspect some very powerful people were backing the company?This is exactly the situation that exists at the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Read these two quotes:"The government's Vaccine for Children Program (a CDC organization) purchases vaccines for about 50 percent of children in the U.S." (The Atlantic, February 10, 2015)"The CDC currently spends over $4 billion purchasing vaccines [annually] from drug makers..." (Health Impact News, October 24, 2016)However, the CDC is also the gold standard for research on the safety and efficacy of vaccines. It turns out an unending stream of studies on these subjects. And the results of those studies are dutifully reported in the mainstream press.Do you think, under any circumstances, the CDC would publish data showing vaccines are ineffective and dangerous? They'd be cutting their own throats."Well, we spend $4 billion a year buying vaccines from drug companies, but guess what? These vaccines are often dangerous..."Every time you read about a CDC study on vaccines, keep this obvious (and clearly illegal) conflict of interest in mind.THREE: MASSIVE OVERESTIMATE OF FLU DEATHS IN THE US, IN ORDER TO PUSH THE FLU VACCINE.In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published a shocking report by Peter Doshi, which created tremors through the halls of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), where "the experts" used to tell the press that 36,000 people in the US die every year from the flu.Here is a quote from Doshi's report, "Are US flu death figures more PR than science?" (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):"[According to CDC statistics], 'influenza and pneumonia' took 62,034 lives in 2001---61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified."Boom.You see, the CDC has created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: "Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006)." These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure.However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even further.In other words, it's all promotion and hype."Well, uh, we say that 36,000 people die from the flu every year in the US. But actually, it's closer to 20. However, we can't admit that, because if we did, we'd be exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story windows...and, by the way, we'd be put in prison for fraud."The CDC must turn out a steady stream of outrageous lies about the need for vaccines. If they didn't, they'd have no way to justify the billions of dollars they spend every year buying the vaccines from drug companies.So, Spider Group, don't stop now. Deepen your probe. Become true heroes for honest research, expose the deep roots of corruption in your Agency, and do the right thing for the American people you're sworn to serve.
QuoteBy Jon RappoportRobert Kennedy, Jr. "All the things that I do are bent on forcing this [vaccine] debate out into the open---because once the science is in the open, the CDC's position is so fragile, it's an edifice of fraud, fraud stacked upon fraud, so high and so wobbly, that even a slight breeze of public scrutiny will topple it."Kennedy states that President Trump has appointed him to head up a task force investigating vaccine safety. The above quote indicates Kennedy, would, if given the green light, probe much more than the use of mercury in vaccines---his main topic of interest thus far.This would be a very good thing. The CDC is most certainly an edifice of fraud. It has concealed many of its crimes over the years.If he hasn't already, Kennedy should make contact with an anonymous group of scientists at the CDC who call themselves Spider. They have written a letter to the CDC chief of staff accusing the agency of widespread "unethical practices...influenced and shaped by outside parties...[that] threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health."In my recent open letter to Spider, I presented three shocking areas of fraud at the CDC that they should expose:Swine Flu, a dud and phony "epidemic," presented as a dire global threat requiring vaccination;A structural conflict of interest, in which the CDC buys billions of dollars of vaccines and, at the same time, carries out many studies assessing vaccine safety---with this much money on the line, the Agency would never, under any circumstances, admit vaccines are dangerous;A massive overestimation of annual flu deaths in the US, in order to push the necessity of the flu vaccine.In this second memo, I present two more shocking areas which should receive the immediate attention of the dissident Spider scientists at the CDC, and Mr. Kennedy:ONE: THE CASE OF JULIE GERBERDING.On August 27, 2014, CDC scientist William Thompson came out of the shadows and revealed that he had participated in a major scientific fraud:Ten years earlier, he and his co-authors had published a study claiming there was no MMR-vaccine connection to autism. They had omitted vital data which contradicted that finding.The MMR vaccine was increasing the risk of autism. Thompson knew it. So did his co-authors. They buried that chilling fact.Before their fake study was published, Thompson wrote to the head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding, informing her that, at an upcoming conference, he would be "presenting the summary of our results from the Metropolitan Atlanta Autism Case-Control Study [and]...I will have to present several problematic results relating to statistical associations between the receipt of MMR vaccine and autism."In other words, Thompson was ready to blow the whistle on the MMR vaccine-autism connection. He received no reply from CDC Director Gerberding, and his presentation at the conference was canceled.Fast forward: in 2009, Gerberding left the CDC.She eventually went to work as the president of the vaccine division at Merck.Merck. Manufactures. The. MMR. Vaccine.Get it?TWO: OVERWHELMINGLY, FLU IS NOT FLU. THEREFORE, EVEN PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FLU VACCINE ARE BEING DECEIVED.Peter Doshi, PhD, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals a monstrosity.As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.So they don't have the flu.Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn't possibly prevent all those "flu cases" that aren't flu cases.The vaccine couldn't possibly work.The vaccine isn't designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.Here's the exact quote from Peter Doshi's BMJ review, "Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease" (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):"...even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the 'flu' problem because most 'flu' appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive."...It's no wonder so many people feel that 'flu shots' don't work: for most flus, they can't."Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren't the flu.So even if you're a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you're on the short end of the stick here. They're conning your socks off. The CDC is supposed to be doing an accurate count of case numbers of diseases in the US. They're lying and covering up the facts.---Those of you in the Spider group of rebel scientists at the CDC, get busy. There are many more instances of massive corruption at your Agency. Dig in. Don't let the American people down.Go all the way.You, too, Mr. Kennedy.