Started by M O'D, September 09, 2014, 09:37:04 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
QuoteVaccine fraud? What about psychiatric fraud? Staggering.by Jon RappoportSeptember 8, 2014www.nomorefakenews.comThis is an article about the intentional construction of false reality.Not a minor construction—a huge, enduring, institutional, wing-flapping, money-munching, poison-dispensing, Matrix-welding, yet "humanity-saving" invention.In the wake of CDC whistleblower William Thompson's confession that he buried a vaccine-autism connection, some people reacted with shock—as if this was the first case of rank fraud that had ever taken place within the hallowed halls of medical research.How about a whole branch of modern medicine that is a fraud from top to bottom?Let us turn the page to Psychiatry.And the lying liars who lie about it.Most Americans don't have a clue about the way psychiatry actually works or its pose of being a science.The public hears techno-speak and nods and surrenders.If psychiatrists are experts on the human mind, mice can navigate the Arctic in canoes. But psychiatrists are educated to be able to talk a good game.And politicians are more than happy to mouth vagaries, and consign the problems of society to "mental-health professionals."It turns out that the phrase "mental health" was invented by psyop specialists, who needed to create an analogy to physical well-being. They needed to, because:THERE ARE NO DEFINITIVE LABORATORY TESTS FOR ANY SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDER.And along with that:ALL SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDERS ARE CONCOCTED, NAMED, LABELED, DESCRIBED, AND CATEGORIZED by a committee of psychiatrists, from menus of human behaviors.Their findings are published in periodically updated editions of The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), printed by the American Psychiatric Association.Of course, pharmaceutical companies, who manufacture highly toxic drugs to treat every one of these "disorders," are leading the charge to invent more and more mental-health categories, so they can sell more drugs and make more money.But we have a mind-boggling twist. Under the radar, one of the great psychiatric stars, who has been out front in inventing mental disorders, went public. He blew the whistle on himself and his colleagues. And for years, almost no one noticed.His name is Dr. Allen Frances, and he made VERY interesting statements to Gary Greenberg, author of a Wired article: "Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness." (Dec.27, 2010).Major media never picked up on the interview in any serious way. It never became a scandal.Dr. Allen Frances is the man who, in 1994, headed up the project to write the latest edition of the psychiatric bible, the DSM-IV. This tome defines and labels and describes every official mental disorder. The DSM-IV eventually listed 297 of them.In an April 19, 1994, New York Times piece, "Scientist At Work," Daniel Goleman called Frances "Perhaps the most powerful psychiatrist in America at the moment..."Well, sure. If you're sculpting the entire canon of diagnosable mental disorders for your colleagues, for insurers, for the government, for Pharma (who will sell the drugs matched up to the 297 DSM-IV diagnoses), you're right up there in the pantheon.Long after the DSM-IV had been put into print, Dr. Frances talked to Wired's Greenberg and said the following:"There is no definition of a mental disorder. It's bullshit. I mean, you just can't define it."BANG.That's on the order of the designer of the Hindenburg, looking at the burned rubble on the ground, remarking, "Well, I knew there would be a problem."After a suitable pause, Dr. Frances remarked to Greenberg, "These concepts [of distinct mental disorders] are virtually impossible to define precisely with bright lines at the borders."Frances might have been referring to the fact that his baby, the DSM-IV, had rearranged earlier definitions of ADHD and Bipolar to permit many MORE diagnoses, leading to a vast acceleration of drug-dosing with highly powerful and toxic compounds.Finally, at the end of the Wired interview, Frances flew off into a bizarre fantasy:"Diagnosis [as spelled out in the DSM-IV] is part of the magic...you know those medieval maps? In the places where they didn't know what was going on, they wrote 'Dragons live here'...we have a dragon's world here. But you wouldn't want to be without the map."Translation: Patients need hope for the healing of their troubles; so even if we psychiatrists are shooting blanks and pretending to know one kind of mental disorder from another, even if we're inventing these mental-disorder definitions based on no biological or chemical diagnostic tests—it's a good thing, because patients will then believe and have hope; because psychiatrists place a label on their problems...Needless to say, this has nothing to do with science.Dr. Frances' work on the DSM-IV allowed for MORE toxic drugs to be prescribed, because the definition of Bipolar was expanded to include more people.Adverse effects of Valproate (given for a Bipolar diagnosis) include:* acute, life-threatening, and even fatal liver toxicity;* life-threatening inflammation of the pancreas;* brain damage.Adverse effects of Lithium (also given for a Bipolar diagnosis) include:* intercranial pressure leading to blindness;* peripheral circulatory collapse;* stupor and coma.Adverse effects of Risperdal (given for "Bipolar" and "irritability stemming from autism") include:* serious impairment of cognitive function;* fainting;* restless muscles in neck or face, tremors (may be indicative of motor brain damage).Dr. Frances' label-juggling act also permitted the definition of ADHD to expand, thereby opening the door for greater and greater use of toxic Ritalin (and other similar compounds) as the treatment of choice.So what about Ritalin?In 1986, The International Journal of the Addictions published a most important literature review by Richard Scarnati. It was called "An Outline of Hazardous Side Effects of Ritalin (Methylphenidate)" [v.21(7), pp. 837-841].Scarnati listed a large number of adverse effects of Ritalin and cited published journal articles which reported each of these symptoms.For every one of the following (selected and quoted verbatim) Ritalin effects, there is at least one confirming source in the medical literature:* Paranoid delusions* Paranoid psychosis* Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis* Activation of psychotic symptoms* Toxic psychosis* Visual hallucinations* Auditory hallucinations* Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences* Effects pathological thought processes* Extreme withdrawal* Terrified affect* Started screaming* Aggressiveness* Insomnia* Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expectamphetamine-like effects* Psychic dependence* High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug* Decreased REM sleep* When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia* Convulsions* Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.A recent survey revealed that a high percentage of children diagnosed with bipolar had first received a diagnosis of ADHD. This is informative, because Ritalin and other speed-type drugs are given to kids who are slapped with the ADHD label. Speed, sooner or later, produces a crash. This is easy to call "clinical depression."Then comes Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft. These drugs can produce temporary highs, followed by more crashes. The psychiatrist notices the up and down pattern—and then produces a new diagnosis of Bipolar (manic-depression) and prescribes other drugs, including Valproate and Lithium.In the US alone, there are at least 300,000 cases of motor brain damage incurred by people who have been prescribed so-called anti-psychotic drugs (aka "major tranquilizers"). Risperdal (mentioned above as a drug given to people diagnosed with Bipolar) is one of those major tranquilizers. (source: "Toxic Psychiatry", Dr. Peter Breggin, St. Martin's Press, 1991)This psychiatric drug plague is accelerating across the land.Where are the mainstream reporters and editors and newspapers and TV anchors who should be breaking this story and mercilessly hammering on it week after week? They are in harness.And Dr. Frances is somehow let off the hook. He's admitted in print that the whole basis of his profession is throwing darts at labels on a wall, and implies the "effort" is rather heroic—when, in fact, the effort leads to more and more poisonous drugs being dispensed to adults and children, to say nothing of the effect of being diagnosed with "a mental disorder."I'm not talking about "the mental-disease stigma," the removal of which is one of Hillary Clinton's missions in life. No, I'm talking about MOVING A HUMAN INTO THE SYSTEM, the medical apparatus, where the essence of the game is trapping that person to harvest his money, his time, his energy, and of course his health—as one new diagnosis follows on another, and one new toxic treatment after another is undertaken, from cradle to grave.The result is a severely debilitated human being (if he survives), whose major claim to fame is his list of diseases and disorders.Thank you, Dr. Frances.Here is a smoking-gun statement made by another prominent expert, on an episode of PBS' Frontline series. The episode was: "Does ADHD Exist?"PBS FRONTLINE INTERVIEWER: Skeptics say that there's no biological marker—that it [ADHD] is the one condition out there where there is no blood test, and that no one knows what causes it.BARKLEY (Dr. Russell Barkley, professor of psychiatry and neurology at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center): That's tremendously naïve, and it shows a great deal of illiteracy about science and about the mental health professions. A disorder doesn't have to have a blood test to be valid. If that were the case, all mental disorders would be invalid...There is no lab test for any mental disorder right now in our science. That doesn't make them invalid.Astonishing.Without intending to, Dr. Barkley blows the whistle on his own profession.So let's take Dr. Barkley to school. Medical science, and disease-research in particular, rests on the notion that you can make a diagnosis backed up by lab tests. If you can't produce lab tests, you're spinning fantasies.These fantasies might be hopeful, they might be "educated guesses," they might be launched from traditional centers of learning, they might be backed up by billions of dollars of grant money...but they're still fantasies.If I said the moon was made of green cheese, even if I were a Harvard professor, sooner or later someone would ask me to produce a sample of moon rock to be tested for "cheese qualities." I might begin to feel nervous, I might want to tap dance around the issue, but I would have to submit the rock to a lab.In his statement to the PBS Frontline interviewer, Dr. Barkley is essentially saying, "There is no lab test for any mental disorder. If a test were the standard of proof, we wouldn't have science at all, and that would mean our whole profession rests on nothing—and that is absurd, so therefore a test doesn't matter."That logic is no logic at all. Barkley is proving the case against himself. He just doesn't want to admit it.Close to 50 years ago, psychiatry was dying out as a profession. Fewer and fewer people wanted to see a psychiatrist for help, for talk therapy. All sorts of new therapies were popping up. The competition was leaving medical psychiatry in the dust.As Dr. Peter Breggin describes it in his landmark book, Toxic Psychiatry, a deal was struck. Drug companies would bankroll psychiatry and rescue it. These companies would pour money into professional conferences, journals, research. In return, they wanted "science" that would promote mental disease as a biological fact, a gateway into more and more drugs. Everyone would win—except the patient.So the studies were rolled out, and the list of mental disorders expanded. The FDA was in on the deal as well, as evidenced by their drug "safety" approvals, in the face of the obvious damage these drugs were doing.So this is how we arrived at where we are. This was the plan, and it worked.Under the cover story, it was all fraud all the time. Without much of a stretch, you could say psychiatry has been the most widespread profiling operation in the history of the human race. Its goal has been to bring humans everywhere into its system. It hardly matters which label a person is painted with, as long as it adds up to a diagnosis and a prescription of drugs.I'm aware that some people, reading this far, will still believe that the mental disorders rolled out by psychiatrists are real.There is an explanation for this.Psychiatrists may be crazy, but they aren't necessarily stupid, when it comes to strategy.They take the very real pain, suffering, anguish, and isolation people experience, and they label it, slice it, dice it; they make it into official categories, disorders—and therefore their "science" seems accurate...because people do feel sad, lonely, isolated.Then, psychiatrists take one further step. They ceaselessly claim the cause for all this suffering rests in the brain—despite the fact that they have no defining diagnostic tests.In the absence of tests, they say, "Well, we know this is all about chemical imbalance in the brain."Chemical imbalance, chemical imbalance, the heavily funded and promoted mantra.The public buys in. "Well, sure, that must be it."Dr. Ronald Pies, editor-in-chief emeritus of the Psychiatric Times, laid that nonsensical hypothesis to rest in the July 11, 2011, issue of the Times with this staggering admission:"In truth, the 'chemical imbalance' notion was always a kind of urban legend- – never a theory seriously propounded by well-informed psychiatrists."For decades the whole basis of psychiatric drug research, drug prescription, and drug sales has been: "we're correcting a chemical imbalance in the brain."The problem was, researchers had never established a normal baseline for chemical balance. So they were shooting in the dark. Worse, they were faking a theory. Pretending they knew something when they didn't.In his 2011 piece in Psychiatric Times, Dr. Pies tries to cover his colleagues in the psychiatric profession with this fatuous remark:"In the past 30 years, I don't believe I have ever heard a knowledgeable, well-trained psychiatrist make such a preposterous claim [about chemical imbalance in the brain], except perhaps to mock it...the 'chemical imbalance' image has been vigorously promoted by some pharmaceutical companies, often to the detriment of our patients' understanding."Absurd. First of all, many psychiatrists have explained and do explain to their patients that the drugs are there to correct a chemical imbalance.And second, if all well-trained psychiatrists have known, all along, that the chemical-imbalance theory is a fraud......then why on earth have they been prescribing tons of drugs to their patients......since those drugs are developed on the false premise that they correct the imbalance?Truth is, the honchos of psychiatry are seeing the handwriting on the wall. Their game has been exposed. They're taking heavy flack on many fronts.The chemical imbalance theory is a fake. There are no defining physical tests for any of the 300 so-called mental disorders. All diagnoses are based on arbitrary clusters or menus of human behavior. The drugs are harmful, dangerous, toxic. Some of them induce violence. Suicide, homicide. Some of the drugs cause brain damage.So the shrinks have to move into another model, another con, another fraud. And they're looking for one.For example, genes plus "psycho-social factors." A mish-mash of more unproven science."New breakthrough research on the functioning of genes is paying dividends and holds great promise in the area of mental health..." Professional gibberish.Meanwhile, the business model demands drug sales.So even though the chemical-imbalance nonsense has been discredited, it will continue on as a dead man walking, a zombie.Big Pharma isn't going to back off. Trillions of dollars are at stake.You can be sure major Pharma players are meeting behind closed doors with leaders of the American Psychiatric Association (APA). The mafia is making a house call.They are reminding the APA that they have a deal. No cancellation allowed."You guys promoted the chemical-imbalance theory. That was the arrangement. So keep promoting it. We don't care how many lies you have to tell. Don't try to develop a conscience all of a sudden. This is business."The mafia doesn't like it when people try to interrupt business.power outside the matrixFinally, if psychiatry and its array of mental disorders is complete fraud, from top to bottom, why do so many people "act crazy?" Why do so many people have problems?If we rule out the people who aren't "crazy" at all, but are merely failing to fit into the androidal scheme of modern living, there are many answers to that question.Any honest health practitioner would search for the answers with each individual patient. No more one-size fits all.Here are a few possibilities: poisonous results of a toxic drug or vaccine; exposure to an environmental toxin; severe nutritional deficits; gross sensitivity-reaction to a food element like gluten; the effects of colors, dyes, and other chemicals in processed foods; physical and emotional abuse and damage; a head injury; oxygen-deficit before or at birth; legitimate fear of violence at home, at school, in the neighborhood; living in an environment lacking basic sanitation; as journalists Joan Swirsky and Caroline Rodgers, and Dr. Pasko Rakic have been pointing out, the effects of ultrasound on pregnant mothers—an issue that needs a great deal more exposure.Meanwhile, the reality builders continue to expand the structure of psychiatry. For deception, for money, for power, for control.Psychiatry is a pseudoscience.A fraud.