Recent posts

1 8 9 10
November 20, 2015, 09:23:33 AM
greetings, well it all depends on how you have approached it, what have you replaced your meat with etc. I've just been informed that apparently my partner and i live a near enough vegan diet [which i found a shock lol -'ve just been approaching my diet in the sense of eating what is beneficial for my functioning and avoided like the plague what causes problems; down to the point of not wanting to eat another stake (however appealing) till i know the little (probably furry) animal would have lived a healthy and happy existence under my care]
Juicing is a good way to go for multiple reasons, believe me when i say i was a sarcastic skeptic, and juicing has done nothing for sarcasm but it is excellent otherwise ;)
November 18, 2015, 01:23:02 AM
Are there any vegans out there and can you recommend any good diet plans? I've been sticking to a vegan diet for about a month now and to be honest, it's a bit of a struggle plus I'm not really enjoying eating anymore. I miss the sense of satisfaction that meat tended to give..... is this normal?
July 24, 2015, 08:27:44 AM

A sovereign Grand Jury of twenty-five good men and women of Nottinghamshire, upon hearing the evidence that the Crawford family has just cause to bring both civil and criminal proceedings against those individuals responsible for the violent enforcement of a plainly fraudulent claim by the Bradford & Bingley Building Society, has unanimously nullified the judgment and all related orders made against Tom and Sue; and declared that they must be fairly compensated for their losses and restored to their property without delay, under the protection of the Treaty of Universal Community Trust, as officially documented in the certified copy of the decision posted below.

July 20, 2015, 09:19:04 PM


Currently known as Nottingham, THE ANCIENT BRITONS called it "Tig Guocobauc" ('the dwelling of caves').

Given the documented multiple failures of the 'Judiciary' operating in and through the Crown House of Rothschild's de facto court and tribunal service to provide remedy to the people in this geographical locale in the face of a variety of most serious matters relating to, without limitation, void mortgages and other financial tyrannies, unlawful council tax collection and enforcement, institutional child abuse and trafficking through state-run children's homes and general levels of state-sponsored tyranny, many of which are backed-up by the bully-boy collectors commonly known as Notts Police, it is established beyond doubt that that said local justice service is unfit for purpose.

In the light of which, the good and sovereign people of these parts, having been utterly failed by their 'public servants', are required to provide that which the judiciary has denied them – lawful remedy. continued here[/email]]

All genuinely interested individuals are encouraged to send an email to [email][/email]
July 08, 2015, 01:47:31 PM




An eye witness account and overview of the criminality of the state's terrorist attack on the Crawford Family.

Background: UKAR [United Kingdom Assets Resolution] is an agency created to run down the mortgage books of the two bailed out banks, Northern Rock and Bradford and Bingley.

It is Treasury owned, which means it is under the control of the Crown House of Rothschild.

Said House of Rothschild took over the financial controls of these lands after the battle of Waterloo, 200 years ago. [...]
April 15, 2015, 09:04:22 AM

Prime Minister Tony Abbott is a moron

By Jon Rappoport
April 14, 2015

Watch what's happening in Australia. Something like it could be coming to your front door.

If you live in Australia, it's already at your door.

The Daily Telegraph (4/12) reports:

"Prime Minister Tony ­Abbott and Social Services Minister Scott Morrison will today announce the historic reforms, which mean parents who fail to immunise their children will no longer be paid the $200-a-week childcare benefit, the $7500-a-year childcare rebate or the $726 Family Tax Benefit A annual supplement.

"The combined childcare and welfare payments at risk could amount to up to $30,000 a year for a family with two young children. The changes will come into effect from January 1, 2016."

Several years ago, when I wrote about the impending passage of Obamacare, I warned that, up the road, restrictions would tighten. Once under the umbrella of national health insurance, people would find their options squeezed.

View Australia as an object lesson.

What Australia is now facing illustrates the two-step dance: become more reliant on government money; become vulnerable to having that money taken away.

"We, the government, care about you and your health, we love you, we help you, we give you money...but don't resist us. Obey our rules or suffer the consequences."

Of course, government money turns out to be a lot like tax money, money you pay the government every year.

"Give us your (tax) money. Then we'll decide how to give some of it back to you, and under what conditions."

The Daily Telegraph article included a stunning remark from Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who apparently can't think beyond the level of a one-year-old:

"Parents who vaccinate their children should have confidence that they can take their children to childcare without the fear that their children will be at risk of contracting a serious or potentially life-threatening illness because of the conscientious objections of others [who don't vaccinate their children]."

My, my, Tony. Where did you go to school? The Australian Academy of Brainwashing?

See, this is the way it works. Follow carefully, Tony, and try to get this. A vaccinated child is supposed to be immune from the diseases for which he's vaccinated.

That's the whole idea.

So if little Jimmy, who's been vaccinated, comes into contact with little Bobby, who hasn't been vaccinated, Jimmy will stay healthy.

Why? Because Jimmy was vaccinated.

Now, if that's not true, and Jimmy can get sick when Bobby breathes on him or touches him, then tell me this, Tony: why did little Jimmy's parents bother vaccinating him? Why did they allow him to be injected with germs and toxic chemicals?

Answer, Tony. If you can't answer, you have to go back to school and start over, in the first grade.

Need a quick refresher?

Bobby's parents don't vaccinate Bobby.

Jimmy's parents do vaccinate Jimmy.

Bobby and Jimmy sit on the floor and play with blocks.

What will happen to Jimmy?

Answer: nothing. Why? Because Jimmy is protected. He received his vaccines.

But wait. Many medical experts, just like you, Tony, are crazy or they're lying or they're idiots...because they, too, say Jimmy is in danger from little Bobby.

They're tacitly admitting that even though Jimmy was vaccinated up to his eyeballs, he's unprotected.

Therefore, getting vaccinated is more like a...religious ritual, some kind of conjuring, a ceremony.

The man in the white coat is the high priest, the parents are the devotees, and their children are the little fetish-objects.

If the parents (devotees) have a few doubts or questions, the doctor (high priest) looks down his arrogant nose at them and mumbles a few words of gibberish to justify his position on vaccination.

It's all good in the Holy Church of Biological Mysticism.

It occurs to me that, if there were, say, a million parents in Australia who had a grip on basic logic and could think this thing through, they would all stand up on their hind legs and say NO to vaccination.

That would put you in a pickle, wouldn't it, Tony?

But not to worry. The rough-and-ready spirit of Australia is dead, isn't it? Individualism, independent decision-making...a thing of the past, right? Now Australians keep their heads down and go about their business and obey the government, yes?

No need for honesty or rebellion. The government is good, the government is kind, the government is Daddy and Mommy, the government has the population cowed and hypnotized.

It's a new day, a wonderful day, and everybody is happy. Have a beer, mate, and forget how things used to be. That was just a fairy tale.

Australia, America, England? Earth? Keep your eyes straight ahead and walk in lock-step toward Paradise.
March 15, 2015, 03:05:41 PM
Hi all,
Read this and please share  >:(

Irish Judiciary Making Up The Rules As They Go, With New Laws 'Invented'
March 03, 2015, 04:43:37 PM

Trial balloons

Moving targets
QuoteBy Jon Rappoport
March 3, 2015

"Do you want to manufacture Time? Jump on the elite bandwagon and earn your stripes as an elite propagandist. Past, present, and future are yours to shape, infinitely elastic and malleable." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

In my latest collection, Power Outside The Matrix, I've included a long section titled, "Analyzing Information in the Age of Disinformation."

I invite you to read about Power Outside The Matrix at

Oxford Dictionary defines a trial balloon as "a tentative measure taken or statement made to see how a new policy will be received."

That's a bland description. The measures taken aren't always tentative. In fact, some may be quite aggressive: criminal prosecutions of the innocent; drone strikes; pronouncements of fake epidemics; bills curbing freedom; wars.

In other words, all intelligence ops and important government/corporate actions always include the trial-balloon aspect.

A war going on overseas? Analysts at home are put to work assessing public reaction, levels of public resistance, and so on.

Depending on their verdict, new propaganda strategies are launched to gain public support.

These strategies constitute moving targets for independent minds who are trying to figure out what's going on.

The last Iraq war was variously promoted as: a necessary and relevant reaction to 9/11; an invasion to disable Saddam's weapons of mass destruction; an effort to topple an evil dictator and liberate the Iraqi people; a continuance of the mission to spread democracy around the world; a geo-political action to prevent destabilization of the Middle East; and even George W Bush's revenge for an earlier dastardly effort to assassinate his father.

Reveal the fraudulent basis of any one of these claims, and a new one would pop up.

Understand that each piece of propaganda for war against Iraq was a calculated decision, and was based on an assessment of US public reaction to prior pieces of propaganda.

Each item of propaganda was a trial balloon. Float balloon A, gauge the reaction. Based on the nature of reaction, float balloon B, gauge the reaction. And so on.

The war against Iraq itself was also treated as a trial balloon at every stage of the operation. How is the public responding on day one of the invasion, day four, day 27, day 46...

It isn't always one series of consecutive propaganda items---these bits can overlap. But you get the idea.

In intelligence groups, analysts are always there collating public and press reactions, and their conclusions are used to come up with new PR approaches. It's a feedback loop.

The entire era of the 1960s was eventually treated as a trial balloon and examined by many analysts at think tanks and intelligence agencies and even advertising agencies.

The objective?

"What lessons can we learn that will enable us to exercise more control over the population?'

At a very important level, one lesson was: promote the idea that humans are groups, not individuals.

Judging by the enormous protests against the war in Vietnam, analysts could see there was a rising sentiment for collective action and collective thought.

How could this growing trend be channeled to produce a reduction of freedom?

One important point that was discovered: when the compulsory military draft ended, serenity (apathy) was immediately restored on college campuses. No more demonstrations. No more protests. Students suddenly focused on how they could "find a niche in the job market."

So, lesson learned, and going forward: initiate a threat, encourage collective action, reduce the threat, bring about passivity. Introduce a new threat (real or imaginary), stimulate collective action, reduce that threat, create more apathy. On and on. Stimulus-response.

The end result? A generalized chronic apathy, plus an attitude that the individual is going extinct, and only the collective matters.

That's a powerful dose of toxic medicine for a population.

Backing away from the entire era of the 1960s and viewing it as a trial balloon---a strategy that worked.

(Of course, during the 60s, various ops were launched with the intention to distract and dumb down the young population; among them, the flood of drugs, the Laurel Canyon hatchery of music stars, etc.)

Recently, we saw the Disneyland-measles op. Based on an absurdly small number of purported cases, a great amount of sentiment was stimulated.

First and foremost (without which the whole campaign would have fizzled), we had the Disney component.

"Happiest place on dire disease in children...horror story...the good turns sinister...where can we take our children for fun these days and remain safe from us..."

That was stage one.

Following from the initial imagery that transformed happiness into fear (the basis of any good horror movie), we were treated, in succession, to:

The kids who got sick weren't vaccinated. Protect our children. They all need to be vaccinated. Without vaccination, sudden destruction spreads. Some parents are delinquent. What's wrong with these parents? They're anti-vaccine. They're crazy. They're against science. They're uneducated morons. They're criminals. They should be thrown in jail. Their kids should be taken away from them. We have to pass new laws making vaccination mandatory in all cases, in all places. What? You mean vaccines aren't already mandatory? How can that be? Listen to doctors. They know the truth. The anti-vaccine crazies are pretending they're doctors...

Moving targets. Knock one down, another pops up. One propaganda item (trial balloon) after another is launched. Public reaction is positive? Good. Float the next balloon. The public support is growing? Good. Press harder.

"Wow, this is going better than we expected. Fantastic. Let's get a whole bunch of states to pass laws knocking out all exemptions to vaccination. Let's double down."

Again, this isn't a perfectly executed machine-series of propaganda items...but it is a conscious op, and there are analysts who are gauging public reaction, blow by blow, and greenlighting new levels of pressure on the public.

Notice: the group phenomenon is at work here as well. Herd immunity must be obtained. Protect all the children through vaccination. Mothers must join the battle. The whole population is at risk. Collective propaganda. Collectivist thinking.

What any individual may decide about vaccination, based on belief, based on actual investigation...this must be discredited. The individual doesn't count. He's an outlier. He's out of the loop.

Even in acknowledging that resistance to vaccination exists, government authorities and media anchors always frame the situation in terms of "a small but significant group" that opposes vaccines.

It's never the individual. Why? Because that cuts too close to the bone. It tends to awaken the realization that freedom of choice and reason ultimately belong to the individual, not the monolithic State.

Don't touch that hot wire. Leave it alone.

How about GMOs and Monsanto? US media propagandists occasionally admit there are groups and consumers who oppose GMOs in food, but how often do you see a featured lengthy story highlighting a single independent researcher's conclusions criticizing Monsanto?

Again, keep the spotlight off the individual. He's too real. Too impactful. He tends to remind people they are, in fact, individuals. Bad for business.

A drug company has committed egregious fraud by convincing doctors to prescribe a drug for off-label uses? On the network nightly news, where is the in-depth interview with a former company detail man whose job it was to visit doctors, in their offices, and persuade them to breach their Hippocratic Oath? Where is the interview with a doctor who took the bait?

Better to leave individuals out of it. Focus on groups: the company; the doctors; the patients. Less real. More abstract.

During the first stages of the "AIDS crisis," just after HIV was announced as the single cause, a few astute researchers began taking apart the HIV hypothesis.

HIV attacks the T-cells of the immune system? There is no evidence of high levels of HIV in those cells.

Next trial balloon (moving target): HIV actually does the most damage to the macrophages, another type of immune-system cell. No real evidence of that, either.

Wait (another trial balloon): HIV causes the immune system to attack the body in a whole cascade of deadly auto-immune reactions. No proof of that.

Wait: HIV is hiding very deep in the body, that's why it's hard to find much of it. But we can measure the amount of it ("viral load") by doing the vaunted DNA test called PCR. Nonsense; the PCR doesn't measure quantity.

One trial balloon after another; each one shot down.

But the overall effect? Many critics of the HIV hypothesis became tired, threw up their hands, exited the playing field, and sank into disgruntled apathy. Mission accomplished.

These various ops are really intelligence-agency type schemes, whether they come from the specific agencies themselves, other government bureaus, think tanks, PR firms.

For them, Reality itself is propaganda, outfitted along a time line with constant trial balloons, subsequent feedback, new and improved balloons, more feedback...a loop moving from present to future.

In other words, we are talking about the elite manufacture of the content of Time.

Propaganda isn't merely a bag full of lies. It's the continuing invention of a parallel universe. A parallel continuum.

And in that continuum, trial balloons and moving targets are prime instruments.
February 23, 2015, 08:27:06 PM
Hi, Tommy

thanks for the question.

1. The family trust is a private one created for the benefit of the beneficiaries. That is the first layer of protection.
2. This family trust then comes under the protection of the local community trust.
3. As you state, the third layer, or 'umbrella' is that of the jurisdiction of UCT, which is under natural law.

Hope this clarifies things.

Best wishes,

February 11, 2015, 08:59:12 AM

QuoteA private test screening of the ground-breaking shockumentary, The Great British Mortgage Swindle, followed by a special BanksterBusters Conference, featuring a step-by-step forensic expose of the entire swindle, will be taking place in the city of Nottingham on Sunday the 22nd of February 2015. The event will begin at 10:30am and last the entire day.

The organisers seek to provide practical remedies which enable void mortgagors to confront the mortgage swindle head-on, following the first Test Screening of the completed film, which is set for its international launch at the Cannes Market in May 2015. It will also be required that attendees gift £10 on the door or in advance, to help cover the costs and expenses incurred over the past six years, by the explosive anarcho-film's intrepid producers, the Michaels of Bernicia & Deira.

Please find attached below the flyer for the event, print off as many copies as necessary and share far and wide.

To reserve places, go here fill in the form. The location details will be provided nearer the day.
1 8 9 10