Started by M O'D, June 20, 2013, 02:16:49 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote..."Would this be possible if Hitler was a "Zionist Agent"? Do you think these people considered Hitler as the man responsible for the creation of modern day Israel? Or rather, as their ally?Before wrapping this up, I will leave you with the following for your further consideration which demonstrates (again) the utter hypocrisy of the "ALL LIES". Moreover, I believe it is further evidence of a criminal conspiracy to demonize Hitler and NS Germany for the sake of a profitable war, and for the protection of the interests of the self-described "Jewish" Bankster Gangsters, even at the expense of Jews in Germany and Europe. It is high-time for people to re-examine everything they thought they knew regarding Hitler, National Socialist Germany and World War II." http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/zionism-and-the-third-reich-was-hitler-a-zionist-agent-did-hitler-create-israel/
QuoteBasic Books Inc. - 1972, hard coverfrom pages 111 - 113The Hitler FamilyFATHERThere is a great deal of confusion in studying Hitler's family tree. Much of this is due to the fact that the name has been spelled in various ways: Hitler, Hidler, Hiedler, and Huettler. It seems reasonable to suppose, however, that it is fundamentally the same name spelled in various ways by different members of what was basically an illiterate peasant family. Adolf Hitler himself signed his name Hittler on the first Party membership blanks, and his sister usually spells her name as Hiedler. Another element of confusion is introduced by the fact that Adolf's mother's mother was also named Hitler, which later became the family name of his father. Some of this confusion is dissipated, however, when we realize that Adolf's parents had a common ancestor (father's grandfather and mother's great-grandfather), an inhabitant of the culturally backward Waldviertel district of Austria. Adolf's father, Alois Hitler, was the illegitimate son of Maria Anna Schicklgruber. It is generally supposed that the father of Alois Hitler was a Johann Georg Hiedler, a miller's assistant. Alois, however, was not legitimized, and he bore his mother's name until he was forty years of age when he changed it to Hitler. Just why this was done is not clear, but it is generally said among the villagers that it was necessary in order to obtain a legacy. Where the legacy came from is unknown. One could suppose that Johann Georg Hiedler relented on his deathbed and left an inheritance to his illegitimate son together with his name. It seems strange, however, that he did not legitimize the son when he married Anna Schicklgruber thirty-five years earlier. Why the son chose to take the name Hitler instead of Hiedler, if this is the case, is also a mystery that has remained unsolved. Unfortunately, the date of the death of Hiedler has not been established, and consequently we are unable to relate these two events in time. A peculiar series of events, prior to Hitler's birth, furnishes plenty of food for speculation. There are some people who seriously doubt that Johann Georg Hiedler was the father of Alois. Thyssen and Koehler, for example, claim that Chancellor Dollfuss had ordered the Austrian police to conduct a thorough investigation into the Hitler family. As a result of this investigation a secret document was prepared that proved that Maria Anna Schicklgruber was living in Vienna at the time she conceived. At that time she was employed as a servant in the home of Baron Rothschild. As soon as the family discovered her pregnancy she was sent back to her home in Spital where Alois was born. If it is true that one of the Rothschilds is the real father of Alois Hitler, it would make Adolf a quarter Jew. According to these sources, Adolf Hitler knew of the existence of this document and the incriminating evidence it contained. In order to obtain it he precipitated events in Austria and initiated the assassination of Dollfuss. According to this story, he failed to obtain the document at that time since Dollfuss had secreted it and had told Schuschnigg of its whereabouts so that in the event of his death the independence of Austria would remain assured. Several stories of this general character are in circulation. Those who lend credence to this story point out several factors that seem to favor its plausibility. 1. That it is unlikely that the miller's assistant in a small village in this district would have very much to leave in the form of a legacy. 2. That it is strange that Johann Hiedler should not claim the boy until thirty-five years after he had married the mother and the mother had died. 3. That if the legacy were left by Hiedler on the condition that Alois take his name, it would not have been possible for him to change it to Hitler. 4. That the intelligence and behavior of Alois, as well as that of his two sons, is completely out of keeping with that usually found in Austrian peasant families. They point out that their ambitiousness and extraordinary political intuition are much more in harmony with the Rothschild tradition. 5. That Alois Schicklgruber left his home village at an early age to seek his fortune in Vienna where his mother had worked. 6. That it would be peculiar for Alois Hitler, while working as a customs official in Braunau, to choose a Jew named Print, of Vienna, to act as Adolf's godfather unless he felt some kinship with the Jews himself. This is certainly a very intriguing hypothesis, and much of Adolf's later behavior could be explained in rather easy terms on this basis. However, it is not absolutely necessary to assume that he has Jewish blood in his veins in order to make a comprehensive picture of his character with its manifold traits and sentiments. From a purely scientifc point of view, therefore, it is sounder not to base our reconstruction on such slim evidence but to seek firmer foundations. Nevertheless, we can leave it as a possibility that requires further verification. In any event Maria Anna Schicklgruber died when Alois was five years of age. When he was thirteen he left the Waldviertel and went to Vienna where he learned to be a cobbler. The next twenty-three years of his life are largely unaccounted for. It seems probable that during this time he joined the army and had perhaps been advanced to the rank of noncommissioned officer. His service in the army may have helped him to enter the Civil Service as Zollamtsoffizial later on.
QuoteThis is the third and final volume of a trilogy describing the role of the American corporate socialists, otherwise known as the Wall Street financial elite or the Eastern Liberal Establishment, in three significant twentieth-century historical events: the 1917 Lenin-Trotsky Revolution in Russia, the 1933 election of Franklin D. Roosevelt in the United States, and the 1933 seizure of power by Adolf Hitler in Germany.Each of these events introduced some variant of socialism into a major country — i.e. Bolshevik socialism in Russia, New Deal socialism in the United States, and National socialism in Germany....Contemporary academic histories, with perhaps the sole exception of Carroll Quigley's Tragedy And Hope, ignore this evidence. On the other hand, it is understandable that universities and research organizations, dependent on financial aid from foundations that are controlled by this same New York financial elite, would hardly want to support and to publish research on these aspects of international politics. The bravest of trustees is unlikely to bite the hand that feeds his organization.It is also eminently clear from the evidence in this trilogy that "public-spirited businessmen" do not journey to Washington as lobbyists and administrators in order to serve the United States. They are in Washington to serve their own profit-maximizing interests. Their purpose is not to further a competitive, free-market economy, but to manipulate a politicized regime, call it what you will, to their own advantage.It is business manipulation of Hitler's accession to power in March 1933 that is the topic of Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler.
QuoteIn this edition of the ongoing Questions For Corbett podcast series, James answers your questions on weather manipulation, cyber attacks, water wars, biometrics, Hitler, online anonymity and more.
QuotePeace is "counter-revolutionary" since it is war that paves the way for revolution. - See more at: http://henrymakow.com/000275.html#sthash.g8BaLodI.dpufPeace is "counter-revolutionary" since it is war that paves the way for revolution. - The Red Symphonyby Henry Makow Ph.D.(Completely revises Hitler Didn't Want World War from March, 2004)Hitler didn't want a world war, and had no stomach for fighting England, according to Louis Kilzer, author of Churchill's Deception (Simon & Schuster, 1994).Kilzer's book is a twist on the official history of World War Two, a war which continues today as a propaganda template for Good and Evil. According to Kilzer, Hitler advocated an alliance of Germany and her Aryan cousins: England and the United States. His territorial demands were limited to Communist Russia, which he regarded as a proxy for Jewish world ambitions. In fact, he was an agent of Anglo-American Jewish finance, (i.e. the illuminati) which wanted to entrap and destroy Germany. According to Kilzer, the "miracle at Dunkirk" was "an extraordinary peace overture" to England. Hitler halted his generals for three days allowing 330,000 Allied soldiers to escape. "The blood of every single Englishman is too valuable to shed," Hitler said. The racial dogma was a pretext. Anyone serious about destroying Jewish finance would have plucked out its heart - the City of London. OFFICIAL STORY AND TRUE STORYHitler, FDR, Churchill, and Stalin were all members of the Illuminati. Hitler and Churchill were probably linked through Aleister Crowley and the Ordo Templi Orientis. This was the "ugly secret" of World War Two. (There is always a cover story. The "V" really was a symbol of the satanic new wrold order, the inverted cross. Here Churchill signals his true loyalty to those in the know.)World wars are manufactured by the Illuminati to destroy the nation state, kill patriots, degrade and demoralize mankind, increase Illuminati wealth and power, and advance the Luciferian New World Order. (Evidence for this view is cited in text links and articles listed at the end.)Hitler knew that England was controlled by Jewish finance, and was in no way "Aryan." The Illuminati policy of "appeasement" promoted Hitler and set Germany up for destruction in a two-front war. Hitler's "peace gestures" should be seen as acts of a man who was financed by the City of London and assumed he was their agent. His racial doctrines were a cover.Douglas Reed, the (London) Times Correspondent in Berlin, was first tipped off to something fishy when his newspaper suppressed his warnings of the Hitler menace. (See his Controversy of Zion) During the war, the British often refused to make a deal with German generals who wanted to replace Hitler."CHURCHILL'S DECEPTION"According to Kilzer, Hitler was ready to retreat from Western Europe and from much of Poland in exchange for carte blanche in Russia. Kilzer describes how British Intelligence (an arm of the Illuminati) convinced him that a large pro-Nazi (anti Communist) "Peace Party" was prepared to unseat the "war monger" Churchill and grant this wish. This party consisted of the Duke of Windsor (the former King Edward VIII) and appeasement-minded elitists known as the "Cliveden Set." The Nazis had longstanding social ties with this group and confided in them. In fact, this was no "deception." Hitler was an arms-length agent of this group. The Duke of Windsor went to stay at the Rothschild castle in Austria after he abdicated. Could Hitler really have missed this detail? Rudolph Hess, the Deputy Leader of Nazi Germany, also belonged and flew to England May 10, 1941 to negotiate peace. According to Kilzer, Hess had Hitler's blessing. Coincidentally, this was the worst night of the Blitz. Afterward, there was a long lull in both Nazi and British bombing raids. Hitler thought Hess had reached an understanding and turned his attention to the invasion of Russia the following month (June 22, 1941.) In fact, the English Illuminati set up their Nazi brothers for a two-front war. Hitler willingly played the dupe. HITLER'S SECRET BACKERSThe book "Financial Origins of National Socialism" (1933) by "Sydney Warburg" provides another glimpse of how the Illuminist clique supported Hitler. This 70-page booklet was suppressed for many years but was republished in 1983 as "Hitler's Secret Backers." "Warburg" describes a July 1929 meeting with "Carter," the President of J.P. Morgan's Guarantee Trust, the Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks, "the young Rockefeller" and "Glean from Royal Dutch." These were all Rothschild factotums. It was determined that Warburg who spoke German should travel to Germany and ask Hitler how much money he needed to overthrow the state. The only stipulation was that Hitler adopts "an aggressive foreign policy." "Warburg" details five meetings with Hitler between 1929 and 1933. The first took place in a beer cellar and Hitler calculated his needs on the back of a paper plate. About $25 million was transferred. This was extremely important in the depth of the depression because the Nazis provided food and shelter to their supporters. Hitler wasn't told the reason for this support and did not ask. On two occasions, he wondered out loud if "Warburg" was himself Jewish but dismissed the idea before "Warburg" could reply. Please!! Hitler knew exactly where the money originated. There is no "Sydney Warburg" but the internal evidence suggests the author was James P. Warburg, son of Federal Reserve founder Paul Warburg. General Ludendorff's wife testified at the Nuremburg trials that James P. Warburg was the conduit through which eventually $34 million was transferred from Wall Street to the Nazis.The only people with the power to suppress this booklet are the ones it incriminates, and they have a record of suppressing similar works. See also Antony Sutton's discussion of this book.CONCLUSION"Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past." George Orwell The winners write history. Our view of Hitler and the Second World War is largely an Illuminati Jewish banker view.Hitler was created and manipulated by the Jewish bankers he railed against. We are supposed to believe he lost the war because he didn't know they controlled England and the United States as well as Russia. Martin Bormann, Nazi Party Chief and Hitler's Secretary, was the second most powerful man in Nazi Germany. He raised millions of dollars for Hitler's personal use from grateful Illuminati bankers and industrialists. Although Hitler masqueraded as a selfless idealist, he had a fortune stashed in Swiss bank accounts. Albert Speer called Bormann "the maggot in the apple of the Third Reich." Indeed, Bormann was a Soviet spy, "worth 50 divisions," exposed by Kilzer's second book, "Hitler's Traitor" and by Intelligence Chief Reinhard Gehlen. When Gehlen and Canaris raised the issue, Hitler protected Bormann, confirming his complicity. If Hitler weren't a traitor, he would have demanded Rudolf Hess'return. Hess was a peace envoy. But he knew too much.The demented Nazi cause was doomed because the men at the very top, Hitler and Bormann, were agents of Illuminati Jewish world government. They were also responsible for executing the Jewish holocaust. In other words, the people who still use the Holocaust for their propaganda purposes, did it and continue to dominate the world today.Most historians who promote the myth of Adolf Hitler are serving the same cause. Hitler played the dupe. It's time we stopped doing the same. ---See also "Rothschilds Conduct Red Symphony"and "Was Hitler a 'British' Agent?"and Bormann & Hitler Were Traitorsand Winston Churchill Illuminatiand British and Nazi Illuminati Collaborated - See more at: http://henrymakow.com/2013/07/hitler-played-the-dupe-in-ww2.html#sthash.zih9zrvH.JxxAACx4.dpuf