News:

this is a news item (test)

Main Menu

The abolition of the Aristocracy - Reasonable case

Started by PatMcDonald, October 30, 2013, 03:35:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

PatMcDonald

Given;-

that any form of discrimination for "any reason whatsoever" is in violation of the Commonwealth Charter recently signed by Mrs Elizabeth Windsor;-

- Does it not follow that any form of social title or distinction made on the reason of birthright (ie, the Royal Family) is in violation of the Commonwealth Charter and so puts the Aristocracy outside of the Commonwealth?

M O'D

All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice
Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

PatMcDonald

But it's OK - the boss just abolished the institution of the aristrocracy from top to bottom.

That probably wasn't the intended effect, but I do not see how you can have an aristocracy without discrimination.

Therefore, either the Commonwealth is a non-existent organisation (correct) or the aristocracy are a non-existent section of society (incorrect).

I think you might have some more insight now into why nation states are such dangerous ideas, and why I choose not to bother with them (because they don't really exist except that some people choose to believe in them).